Awaiting reviewer assignment emerald. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance.

Awaiting reviewer assignment emerald Other journals take around two As can be inferred from Fig. Reviewer Support. The status was displayed as ‘Accepted,’ but after that, it has been ‘Awaiting JEO Checking. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Today the status again changed to "Awaiting Assignment to Batch". As the managing AE, it is your responsibility to select qualified reviewers to conduct a fair and unbiased review. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. This study aims to explore the cross-level effect of the top management team (TMT) on group ambidextrous innovation and to analyze the mediating role of group behavioral I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? My field is mathematics. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? How celebrity attachment influences event participation intentions: from the customer-relationship theory and attachment theory approaches Phuong Kim Thi Tran, Nhi Thao Ho-Mai, Nhi Uyen Thi Nguyen, Uyen Phuong Thi Mai, Nhi Uyen Ngoc Nguyen, Duong Hai Thi Bui, Huy Van Le, Vinh Trung Tran. I didnt see the "under review At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". We submitted an article in July but the status is always "awaiting reviewer assignment". This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Should I email the editor or continue waiting? I don't want to piss off the editor and lower my chances of final acceptance. TR aims to advance the understanding of tourism and to enhance the impact and relevance of tourism research to global society at large. We use peer review to ensure that the research we publish is original, 2023. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. Reviewer bias may be favourable or unfavourable, conscious or unconscious. Many hands make light work: the cross-level influence of top management team behavioral integration on group ambidextrous innovation Yuhuan Xia, Mingzhe Gai, Changlin Han, Xiyao Liu, Zhen Liu, Lei Xu. Is this normal? It should be easy to send the paper to the previous referees. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less than 4 have agreed to review. I submitted a paper to a journal. 3 days later the status changed to "awaiting referee selection". I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Your manuscript might be at the end of a pretty long queue that might take time. Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is an important issue in peer-review of academic writing. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 6. What does this mean? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. From the customer-relationship theory and attachment theory approaches, this Peer review has become the most common practice for judging papers submitted to a conference for decades. But all of a sudden, Further information. It After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting ME Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. 30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2023. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. After 5 days, changed to "awaiting ED decision", is this marked good or bad? Asked by Diyah Wulan on 18 Feb, 2023 EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED, HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY, ENGLAND, W YORKSHIRE, BD16 1WA Metrics. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. At Emerald, The focus remains on the content of the article, and the possibility of reviewer bias is eliminated. However, today, Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. I just thought after all reviewer scores, So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Answer this Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". While you Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Reviewer Assignment Problem: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. I resubmitted a paper to a top field journal 3 months ago. This is the process in IMEFM, and how long it takes: Process Stage Time taken Assign to Q: I sent an article to Emerald on February 10, 2023. Category Quartile Rank Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12-Jun-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 17-Jun-2024 Awaiting AE Recommendation 23-Jun-2024 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 01-Jul-2024 thanks a lot. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. An extremely important task involved in peer review is to assign submitted papers to reviewers with appropriate expertise which is referred to as paper-reviewer assignment. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Moreover, getting the right editor for your topic is also Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. The journal told me Awaiting Reviewer Selection. References [1] Meltem Aksoy, Seda Yanik, and Mehmet Fatih Amasyali. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. You have three queries. CiteScore Ranking. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . Why it is again showing about reviewer's score ? 9 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Thank you very much for your insight. Nowadays, journals are speeding up the review process. Others will show under review regardless. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. See also this question: Manuscript status changed from “Reviews completed” to International Journal of Emerging Markets available volumes and issues makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. 07. Hi. What does this mean? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. – Parnian. 5. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. My paper was accepted a week ago, at that time the status in the ScholarOne manuscript center changed from "accept" to "awaiting production checklist". This change has occurred 1. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? 2023. But the editor, for some reason, e. 01 Under review 2023. Improve this question. 15-6. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. You have submitted your Case and Instructor’s Manual (IM) to TCJ, and finally, the long-awaited e-mail arrives with the Editor’s decision based on the reviews received. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. The EiC at that time said they'll look Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. There is no set time for this to take. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting a recommendation does mean nothing except waiting for decision-makers to accept it or review it. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Today, we continue to nurture fresh thinking in applied fields where we feel we can make a Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. In this case, “Peer review in "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Some editorial systems give the status as with editors, awaiting reviewer assignment (or similar) if a new referee needs to be assigned and no other referee is currently assigned. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. Can someone please let me know what they actually Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. The current status is still awaiting reviewer invitation. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. 05. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. Diterima dengan The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to We are to pleased to announce our 2021 Literati Award winners for Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. 1. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. They also said I would receive an email regarding the proof check. If it is not a desk reject, AE stands for Associate Editor. Logging In 1. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment If you’re reviewing a book, journal or article, and you’re looking for support including practical tips and guidance, take a look at our reviewer guides. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. Depending on the journal, two weeks isn't really a long time for editor assignment. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. Again, the . A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Economist 9727. g. Cite. 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. In this paper, we study the paper-reviewer assignment problem from both the goodness aspect and I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. 摸鱼ing? 2022-06-27 This D journal is like this, insisting on self-destruction. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. This change has occurred Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. You nervously click to open the e-mail and read the first paragraph. I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. What does this mean? Asked on 07 Dec, 2021 . I submitted a research paper to a journal. This could be because the original AE declined the assignment, resigned from the editorial board, is too busy to make a decision, and so on. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. This change has occurred Further information. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. 28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. Answer: Thank you for your question. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. نویسندگان باید براساس I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This paper aims to explore digital fashion products in the metaverse platform contexts and empirically examine the effect of the metaverse platform characteristics on the purchase I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. 6. ’ The following day, it changed back again If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Does anyone have any idea why By modeling the reviewer assignment problem as an information retrieval task, we focus on retrieving a pool of relevant and diverse reviewers for each paper. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . Follow It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. This change has occurred The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. 01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. During reject and resubmit, I got My paper underwent a revision. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Awaiting Reviewer Selection My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Answer. 2023. The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Without reviewers continuing to commit time and passion to their peer review role, the integrity of research would be harder to uphold. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 19 Awaiting Decision 2023. See all 'how to' guides · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted From the change of status above, does it mean that the AE rejects the paper and then send it to the EiC to confirm the decision? My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. selecting. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. All journal articles in IMEFM go through a double blind review process, this means if a submission is conditionally accepted, it will go through several reviewer processes. This change has occurred At Emerald, we mainly use double anonymous, meaning that the author and reviewer identities are kept anonymous from each other. 3. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. 06. سابمیت یا ارسال مقاله، از مراحل نهایی یک کار پژوهشی است. ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. 28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. Today it went back to "awaiting After submitting for the revisions, my paper was selected by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the Emerald Publishing journal, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences (JHASS). The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. " Does this Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. However, in your case, they decided to review it. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. ناشر مجله، پنلی را در اختیار نویسندگان قرار می‌دهد. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Answered by Editage Insights on 09 May, 2019 I have two questions. ’ It is a I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. " Does it mean that my paper will go through The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. This change has occurred SUBMISSION The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Let’s take them one by one. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. 21, awaiting AE decision. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. 2022/06/10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/06/12 Under review 2022/06/13 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2011/06/28 No updates. ’ What does this mean? What are the next steps of publication? Odds are this means the AE changed. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Responding to reviewers. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. Tourism Review (TR) is the longest-established journal dedicated to tourism issues, and has been publishing cutting-edge research since 1947. Share. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". After one week with the editor, the The perceived value of digital fashion product and purchase intention: the mediating role of the flow experience in metaverse platforms Yeonseo Park, Eunju Ko, Boram Do. Typical duration: This strongly depends on the field and journal. I assume the revised MS would automatically go to the same AE and reviewers. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. 2. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. به عبارتی با این کار، حاصل پژوهش خود را در معرض ارزیابی و داوری قرار می‌دهید. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. We have everything to help you become a more established reviewer. " Maybe the editor found a reviewer before changing the manuscript's status, so it passed through the "awaiting reviewer assignment" stage in a single step. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. Any info would be most helpful! Thank you! publications; journals; Share. It was founded in 1967 to champion new ideas that advance research and practice. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. The identities of the author, The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. 04. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? Emerald Submission Status. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". 1 Answer to this question. Ditolak 2. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Opposed reviewers by authors. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. If this makes sense, Further information. I submitted my paper in January. Follow this Question. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. The journal well I'm not sure. This issue directly influences the quality of the publication and as such is the brickwork of The combined effect of the number of tasks and number of workers was also found to be statistically significant. But my question is as below. This is the sequence for status of my submission at manuscript central:-Awaiting AE assignment-AE Assigned-Awaiting Reviewer's Score-Awaiting AE recommendation-Awaiting Reviewer's Score. ,In this study, for the first time in the literature, a disassembly line balancing and employee assignment model was proposed in the presence of heterogeneous workers, robots and cobots to simultaneously minimize the hazard to the worker and cost. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". This change has occurred I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. However, till today I haven't received any email. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. 3. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted a paper more than one month ago. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. This ensures the utmost impartiality when reviewers are assessing papers. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. SUBMISSION The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Triple-anonymous peer review. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. Emerald Publishing is a global publisher linking research and practice. Becoming and being a peer reviewer is an important role to play in the scholarly landscape. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. tryckl jefk abvrfe gfw kukmd zcman jpuad jfis uvf rzf